v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Toady One"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Suggestion: new section) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:The giant fake bio should be scrapped. This is starting to look like an ED article. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 11:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | :The giant fake bio should be scrapped. This is starting to look like an ED article. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 11:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I agree. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 13:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Me too. The last time I looked at this page, it looked like [http://df.magmawiki.com/index.php?title=Toady_One&oldid=62649 this], which is much more appropriate in my opinion, albeit a bit short. I agree that having a bit more actual information on Tarn would be interesting as well. I don't even find its current state funny at all, really. --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 16:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Unanimous. 99% of that crap was by an IP user on Feb 3, with the cryptic edit-comment "I helped". They also <nowiki><!--hid--></nowiki> all the factual info about Toady, and removed the small bit about Zack. Sounds like a "friend" of T's who's giving him crap, but even if so a lot of that is so personal as to be beyond D-for-Dwarf "in jokes", and for all we know it's a petty attack rather than a joke. Reverting to version suggested by Retro. If someone with a name wants to step forward and convince us otherwise, they're welcome to, but until then imo this is too much for anonymous editing.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 17:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Suggestion == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why not add a few articles on Toady? I recently read one titled something like, "The Brilliance of Dwarf Fortress," and it seemed like it covered enough. | ||
| + | [[Special:Contributions/173.58.152.240|173.58.152.240]] 04:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:46, 30 September 2011
It'd be nice to see a little more biographical (or biological?) information on the Toady One. And why he chose that nickname. --Rusty Mcloon 06:08, 29 May 2008 (EDT)
Well we could always just add some we made up.
- Who ever wrote this bio you deserve a reward I laughed so hard who knew dwarf fortress is based directly off of his life. XD
This is definitely funny, but shouldn't we have some actual biography here? --Eduren 04:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Wow! Simply amazing! 23:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- The giant fake bio should be scrapped. This is starting to look like an ED article. VengefulDonut 11:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. --Briess 13:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Me too. The last time I looked at this page, it looked like this, which is much more appropriate in my opinion, albeit a bit short. I agree that having a bit more actual information on Tarn would be interesting as well. I don't even find its current state funny at all, really. --Retro 16:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Unanimous. 99% of that crap was by an IP user on Feb 3, with the cryptic edit-comment "I helped". They also <!--hid--> all the factual info about Toady, and removed the small bit about Zack. Sounds like a "friend" of T's who's giving him crap, but even if so a lot of that is so personal as to be beyond D-for-Dwarf "in jokes", and for all we know it's a petty attack rather than a joke. Reverting to version suggested by Retro. If someone with a name wants to step forward and convince us otherwise, they're welcome to, but until then imo this is too much for anonymous editing.--Albedo 17:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Me too. The last time I looked at this page, it looked like this, which is much more appropriate in my opinion, albeit a bit short. I agree that having a bit more actual information on Tarn would be interesting as well. I don't even find its current state funny at all, really. --Retro 16:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. --Briess 13:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Suggestion[edit]
Why not add a few articles on Toady? I recently read one titled something like, "The Brilliance of Dwarf Fortress," and it seemed like it covered enough. 173.58.152.240 04:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)