v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Zaratustra"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Zaratustra (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You're my hero. Tiny Toons reference on the Known Bugs page. -[[User:EarthquakeDamage|EarthquakeDamage]] 11:06, 2 November 2007 (EDT) | You're my hero. Tiny Toons reference on the Known Bugs page. -[[User:EarthquakeDamage|EarthquakeDamage]] 11:06, 2 November 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : :3 -- [[User:Zaratustra|Zaratustra]] 19:48, 9 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Hi. You recently removed bituminous coal and lignite from the [[stone#OtherStone]] list. Since [[economic stone]] and [[ore]] have their own respective articles, it no longer makes sense to organize the stone article around those types. Since these are still stones, they deserve mention there, too. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 19:43, 9 November 2007 (EST) | Hi. You recently removed bituminous coal and lignite from the [[stone#OtherStone]] list. Since [[economic stone]] and [[ore]] have their own respective articles, it no longer makes sense to organize the stone article around those types. Since these are still stones, they deserve mention there, too. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 19:43, 9 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Might as well add Limestone and other such stones there, then. -- [[User:Zaratustra|Zaratustra]] 19:48, 9 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:48, 10 November 2007
You're my hero. Tiny Toons reference on the Known Bugs page. -EarthquakeDamage 11:06, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
- :3 -- Zaratustra 19:48, 9 November 2007 (EST)
Hi. You recently removed bituminous coal and lignite from the stone#OtherStone list. Since economic stone and ore have their own respective articles, it no longer makes sense to organize the stone article around those types. Since these are still stones, they deserve mention there, too. VengefulDonut 19:43, 9 November 2007 (EST)
- Might as well add Limestone and other such stones there, then. -- Zaratustra 19:48, 9 November 2007 (EST)