v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.34 Talk:Gem"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Just FYI, dwarves can now polish non-gemstone rocks into cabochons in the jewelers workshop. Even slate!--~~~~") |
(→Gem cuts: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just FYI, dwarves can now polish non-gemstone rocks into cabochons in the jewelers workshop. Even slate!--[[User:Auric|Auric]] 18:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC) | Just FYI, dwarves can now polish non-gemstone rocks into cabochons in the jewelers workshop. Even slate!--[[User:Auric|Auric]] 18:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Gem cuts == | ||
| + | |||
| + | If I'm reading it correctly, raw/objects/entity_default.txt defines what cuts of gem a civ can produce: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | ! ||Dwarf||Human||Goblin||Elf / Kobold /<br />Animal men | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !STONE_SHAPE: | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | *OVAL_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *ROUND_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *CUSHION_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *RECTANGULAR_CABOCHON | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | *OVAL_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *ROUND_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *CUSHION_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *RECTANGULAR_CABOCHON | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | *RECTANGULAR_CABOCHON | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | *OVAL_CABOCHON | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !GEM_SHAPE: | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | *OVAL_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *ROUND_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *CUSHION_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *RECTANGULAR_CABOCHON | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | *POINT_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *TABLE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *SINGLE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *ROSE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *BRIOLETTE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *EMERALD_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *MARQUISE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *OVAL_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *PEAR_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *SQUARE_BRILLIANT_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *RADIANT_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *TRILLION_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *ROUND_BRILLIANT_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *BAGUETTE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *TAPERED_BAGUETTE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *CUSHION_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *OCTAGON_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *SQUARE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | *OVAL_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *ROUND_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *CUSHION_CABOCHON | ||
| + | *RECTANGULAR_CABOCHON | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | *POINT_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *TABLE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *SINGLE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *ROSE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | *BRIOLETTE_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | *RECTANGULAR_CABOCHON | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | *POINT_CUT_GEM | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | *OVAL_CABOCHON | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | Based on this, is the article incorrect in its assessment of how cuts are decided? It would seem "brilliant" is never used alone, and "rose" isn't on our list. I would like someone to check my findings before I edit the article, since I'm not that experienced with looking into the raws. Thanks. --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] 01:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 14 April 2012
Just FYI, dwarves can now polish non-gemstone rocks into cabochons in the jewelers workshop. Even slate!--Auric 18:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Gem cuts
If I'm reading it correctly, raw/objects/entity_default.txt defines what cuts of gem a civ can produce:
| Dwarf | Human | Goblin | Elf / Kobold / Animal men | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STONE_SHAPE: |
|
|
|
|
| GEM_SHAPE: |
|
|
|
|
Based on this, is the article incorrect in its assessment of how cuts are decided? It would seem "brilliant" is never used alone, and "rose" isn't on our list. I would like someone to check my findings before I edit the article, since I'm not that experienced with looking into the raws. Thanks. --timrem 01:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC)