v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:ASCII art reward"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Sub-pages: new section) |
(→Sub-pages: done) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This page is rather large... should it be split off into a few sub-pages? I'm thinking alphabetically by contributor would be best, so "ASCII Art Reward/A-F" "/G-L" "/M-S" "/T-Z" or some other split. We could do chronologically, but then if there's any continuity between two stories for one contributor it wouldn't be apparent. Objections? --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] 16:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC) | This page is rather large... should it be split off into a few sub-pages? I'm thinking alphabetically by contributor would be best, so "ASCII Art Reward/A-F" "/G-L" "/M-S" "/T-Z" or some other split. We could do chronologically, but then if there's any continuity between two stories for one contributor it wouldn't be apparent. Objections? --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] 16:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I've gone ahead and done so, but they should probably be alphabetized on each page rather than kept in the arbitrary order they appeared here. --[[User:Timrem|timrem]] 21:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:58, 2 October 2012
Forum thread Kogut 14:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Sub-pages
This page is rather large... should it be split off into a few sub-pages? I'm thinking alphabetically by contributor would be best, so "ASCII Art Reward/A-F" "/G-L" "/M-S" "/T-Z" or some other split. We could do chronologically, but then if there's any continuity between two stories for one contributor it wouldn't be apparent. Objections? --timrem 16:32, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and done so, but they should probably be alphabetized on each page rather than kept in the arbitrary order they appeared here. --timrem 21:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)