- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Fedor"
(Removing all content from page) |
(RE: PreGen Undo/Edit) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | RE: PreGen Worlds<br> | ||
| + | I don't see why inconsistencies with new worlds is a reason to remove them, as most everything outside mineral layering/concentration is still identical, and those changes are irrelevant to a particular world still being usable. | ||
| + | If, on the other hand, layers are changed when loading the world, then that would indeed cause the sites (if any) associated with the world to become invalid.<br> | ||
| + | One primary function of the PreGen is simply to avoid having to use the time to generate the world, and if no other reason is valid, then this alone should be considered good enough reason to keep them around unless there are far too many, which I don't believe there are, yet.<br> | ||
| + | I would propose that a topic on the discussion page calling for a cleaning of the older PreGens exist for a week to receive any opposition, before the actual removal.<br> | ||
| + | If you still believe they should be removed now, (as opposed to the proposed week,) then feel free to revert my change.<br> | ||
| + | Sincerely,<br> | ||
| + | [[User:N9103|Edward]] 16:32, 15 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:32, 15 January 2008
RE: PreGen Worlds
I don't see why inconsistencies with new worlds is a reason to remove them, as most everything outside mineral layering/concentration is still identical, and those changes are irrelevant to a particular world still being usable.
If, on the other hand, layers are changed when loading the world, then that would indeed cause the sites (if any) associated with the world to become invalid.
One primary function of the PreGen is simply to avoid having to use the time to generate the world, and if no other reason is valid, then this alone should be considered good enough reason to keep them around unless there are far too many, which I don't believe there are, yet.
I would propose that a topic on the discussion page calling for a cleaning of the older PreGens exist for a week to receive any opposition, before the actual removal.
If you still believe they should be removed now, (as opposed to the proposed week,) then feel free to revert my change.
Sincerely,
Edward 16:32, 15 January 2008 (EST)