Template talk:Plantlookup/aux

Does this template need to be updated? it doesn't seem to be handling the new aboveground crops with fruit properly. see Eggplant, which is being listed as "Edible: No". MisterB777 (talk) 19:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I assume that "Edible: No" refers to the plant, rather than the fruit (i.e. what's present in the raws). —Lethosor (talk) 23:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I would assume so as well. However, that's not terribly useful now that the majority of plants' raws aren't structured in a way where the edible bits are the whole plant. I guess what I'm saying is the template no longer represents useful information because it is ignoring the new plant structures. No one really cares if the entire plant is edible if there are multiple parts that are and, instead, it just seems to indicate that nothing about the plant is edible (which is untrue). Unfortunately, I'm no good at templates, or i might try to make it clearer. MisterB777 (talk) 07:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

I Agree that this template is in need of an update since the plant-expansion greatly increased complexity and utility. I'll try to find time to update it in the not-too-distant future.--Loci (talk) 20:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

First pass includes details on fruit. Plants with edible leaves and seeds are not yet indicated as such. I added this functionality to Template:Plantlookup/DF2014 instead of this template to avoid changing prior versions.--Loci (talk) 21:33, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Updated for leaves, flowers, pods & seeds. I think that's all the current plant growths.--Loci (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)