- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "DF2014 Talk:Reputation"
(Created page with "Just fixing up the Rep table w/info from [http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=175195.msg8066193#msg8066193 here] - feel fr...") |
Therahedwig (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just fixing up the [[DF2014:Reputation#Types_of_reputation|Rep table]] w/info from [http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=175195.msg8066193#msg8066193 here] - feel free to add, change or switch out as necessary, rather placeholdery ATM. [[User:Silverwing235|Silverwing235]] ([[User talk:Silverwing235|talk]]) 13:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | Just fixing up the [[DF2014:Reputation#Types_of_reputation|Rep table]] w/info from [http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=175195.msg8066193#msg8066193 here] - feel free to add, change or switch out as necessary, rather placeholdery ATM. [[User:Silverwing235|Silverwing235]] ([[User talk:Silverwing235|talk]]) 13:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Yes, that seems wise. I am getting more and more confused with what I find in my tests since it seems that reputation is also intermingled with how DF handles relationships, hence some of the reputation seeming like relationship names... because they are, going with an adventurer into a fort and telling them of your deeds marks you as a hero in their relationship screen. I am not sure yet how to convey the connection because I am still puzzled on why lua reading leads to certain types of rep being stored in the histfig, others in the entity and yet there's indicators from DF that units do care about the tales of my deeds despite nothing showing up in the lua reading. My best guess is that all rep is first stored on a unit level, and then it's split into entity and histfig level rep...? It will need further testing, I guess. The other thing that makes it so difficult is that this is such uncharted territory it seems almost like fiction. [[User:Therahedwig|Therahedwig]] ([[User talk:Therahedwig|talk]]) 14:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:28, 14 December 2019
Just fixing up the Rep table w/info from here - feel free to add, change or switch out as necessary, rather placeholdery ATM. Silverwing235 (talk) 13:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Yes, that seems wise. I am getting more and more confused with what I find in my tests since it seems that reputation is also intermingled with how DF handles relationships, hence some of the reputation seeming like relationship names... because they are, going with an adventurer into a fort and telling them of your deeds marks you as a hero in their relationship screen. I am not sure yet how to convey the connection because I am still puzzled on why lua reading leads to certain types of rep being stored in the histfig, others in the entity and yet there's indicators from DF that units do care about the tales of my deeds despite nothing showing up in the lua reading. My best guess is that all rep is first stored on a unit level, and then it's split into entity and histfig level rep...? It will need further testing, I guess. The other thing that makes it so difficult is that this is such uncharted territory it seems almost like fiction. Therahedwig (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)