- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Exploit"
m |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Thanks. I'll add that in.--[[User:Richards|Richards]] 02:37, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | :Thanks. I'll add that in.--[[User:Richards|Richards]] 02:37, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Well I guess eventually there will be a limit of how many items can be on a specific square... but for the moment there can be an infinite number of items no any square. --[[User:AlexFili|AlexFili]] 06:10, 9 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:10, 9 June 2008
Deadly bridges
As far as I recall megabeasts can't be killed with bridge, and they destroy it when it tries to smash them. Article does state that bridge can destroy everything. --Someone-else 00:24, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- Also I often hear that demons are not affected by the bridge and that it is destroyed if it lowers on top of them. We need some verification on this.--Richards 00:57, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
Quantum stockpiles
GreyMario wrote an exploit about Siege engines that doesn't makes much sense. We need someone to expand it.--Richards 01:09, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
You fire the stone into the wall, which then falls into the trench. As the trench is limited in space, stones start piling up. (Apparently, catapults are no good at doing what they were historically used for - destroying walls... And they fire in flat trajectories - i would have honestly expected stones to travel up z-levels - but having tested catapults with roofs over them, they work, which i find silly but what the heck...). Note that this is only a quantum stockpile for stone, as opposed to dump, which is much more versatile, but there's also no need to reclaim. --Squirrelloid 02:15, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- Thanks. I'll add that in.--Richards 02:37, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- Well I guess eventually there will be a limit of how many items can be on a specific square... but for the moment there can be an infinite number of items no any square. --AlexFili 06:10, 9 June 2008 (EDT)