- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:D for dwarf"
Khimaera UK (talk | contribs) (D for Do we need?) |
(→Need) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Need == | == Need == | ||
| − | I'm starting to find this a bit patronising. Do we really need such a large warning that an article contains wit? Are we not capable of deducing that for ourselves? Now I'm all for funny and witty articles which liven the place up, but maybe just make the 'warnings' a little more subtle? | + | I'm starting to find this a bit patronising. Do we really need such a large warning that an article contains wit? Are we not capable of deducing that for ourselves? Now I'm all for funny and witty articles which liven the place up, but maybe just make the 'warnings' a little more subtle? <small>– [[template:unsigned|unsigned]] comment by [[User:Khimaera UK|Khimaera UK]]</small> |
| + | |||
| + | It's more of a template for editors rather than users. This way we can have serious pages in addition to silly ones. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 17:18, 14 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:18, 14 January 2009
New image
I uploaded another image for a sharper looking D in context of satire. Any suggestions are welcome. Here are the two images that could be used, one without the minus sign and the other with. The one with the minus sign I originally chose because of the idea that it was in context of satire, but some articles using this template are very well written without satire. So I'm opting for the original. Tell me what you think, and design one for the template if you'd like to. --Richards 10:23, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Need
I'm starting to find this a bit patronising. Do we really need such a large warning that an article contains wit? Are we not capable of deducing that for ourselves? Now I'm all for funny and witty articles which liven the place up, but maybe just make the 'warnings' a little more subtle? – unsigned comment by Khimaera UK
It's more of a template for editors rather than users. This way we can have serious pages in addition to silly ones. VengefulDonut 17:18, 14 January 2009 (EST)