v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Corona688"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Quote Box| '''Goddamn I am sick of this constant editwarring. If I went around removing everything I didn't think was funny the quotes page would be cut in half, but I try to respect other people's content and acknowlege other people's sense of humor.''' --Corona688, responding to a conversation one month old}} | {{Quote Box| '''Goddamn I am sick of this constant editwarring. If I went around removing everything I didn't think was funny the quotes page would be cut in half, but I try to respect other people's content and acknowlege other people's sense of humor.''' --Corona688, responding to a conversation one month old}} | ||
Go for it. Delete the ones you think suck. If they really are popular they will end up back in there through the [[http://dwarf.lendemaindeveille.com/index.php/Talk:Main_Page/Quote#When_to_add_quotes:|guidelines]]. This idea of letting content sit there, no matter what it is, just because someone else put it there. What kind of results come from that kind of system? [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 03:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | Go for it. Delete the ones you think suck. If they really are popular they will end up back in there through the [[http://dwarf.lendemaindeveille.com/index.php/Talk:Main_Page/Quote#When_to_add_quotes:|guidelines]]. This idea of letting content sit there, no matter what it is, just because someone else put it there. What kind of results come from that kind of system? [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 03:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Re: "vandalism" | ||
| + | :Editing on a wiki is no no way a permanent change since everything is preserved in the history. Changing the article, either by adding things or removing them, is an expression of how you think the article is better off looking. Just putting things on the talk page rather than putting it in yourself makes things move at glacial speeds, so it's generally better to risk a little bit of conflict by just editing it into the article and then peacefully resolving anything that comes out of it. | ||
| + | :Also, you havent responded to my question above. I'd like to have a conversation with you about this, but for this I really need your help. | ||
| + | :The reason I'm writing on your talk page rather than the quote page is because the quote page issues have long since been settled. You can see the result [[http://dwarf.lendemaindeveille.com/index.php/Talk:Main_Page/Quote#When_to_add_quotes:|here]]. This conversation is about your editing philosophy rather than what you want to happen on the quote page. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 14:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 7 July 2009
Minor modifications
You should mark your modifications as minor when adding only a few characters (as was the case in Boatmurdered). MagicGuigz 11:09, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry, I'll watch that in the future. Corona688 21:31, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
Sorry about the quote thing, I thought that I had edited that. i2amroy
Goddamn I am sick of this constant editwarring. If I went around removing everything I didn't think was funny the quotes page would be cut in half, but I try to respect other people's content and acknowlege other people's sense of humor. --Corona688, responding to a conversation one month old
Go for it. Delete the ones you think suck. If they really are popular they will end up back in there through the [[1]]. This idea of letting content sit there, no matter what it is, just because someone else put it there. What kind of results come from that kind of system? VengefulDonut 03:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: "vandalism"
- Editing on a wiki is no no way a permanent change since everything is preserved in the history. Changing the article, either by adding things or removing them, is an expression of how you think the article is better off looking. Just putting things on the talk page rather than putting it in yourself makes things move at glacial speeds, so it's generally better to risk a little bit of conflict by just editing it into the article and then peacefully resolving anything that comes out of it.
- Also, you havent responded to my question above. I'd like to have a conversation with you about this, but for this I really need your help.
- The reason I'm writing on your talk page rather than the quote page is because the quote page issues have long since been settled. You can see the result [[2]]. This conversation is about your editing philosophy rather than what you want to happen on the quote page. VengefulDonut 14:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)