v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Gnarker"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, ''very'' large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | ::As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, ''very'' large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Actually it´s around 220-230. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i | + | :Actually it´s around 220-230. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. [[User:Gnarker|Gnarker]] 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009 |
Revision as of 17:41, 29 May 2009
Stone & veins
(Veins) average at least 100 stones each, but veins with over 200 stones have been found, too.
Hi. What makes you say that the average is over 100 stones? And are you sure your 200 stone vein was not two veins combined, as shown on the main veins page?--Albedo 15:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- At first, i have never been saying, that the average is over 100 stones. But frankly, i don´t know, how you say that in English, but i translated, what i would say in German. And the 200 stones vein looks quite like one for me.Gnarker 19:18 CEST/17:18 UTC, 29 May 2009
- German/English can be close but not always. If you say "at least", that means the average is "that number or more" - so, I'm asking if you've seen evidence that the average "could be more", which is what your statement implies. If not, then it should be reverted to just "average about 100".
- As to the vein... if you say so. But your vein could be two veins that are end-to-end. 200 seems very, very large for one vein - but I'll admit I don't know what the limit is, or if there is one.--Albedo 17:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Actually it´s around 220-230. To 'at least', i meant, in the most cases it´s 'that number or more'. And i lookedfor the meaning of average after i wrote that. Gnarker 19:40 CEST/17:40 UTC, 29 May 2009