v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Version 0.28.181.40d"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
LegacyCWAL (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'Is this category really necessary? I mean, unless the articles say otherwise, they ''already'' talk about how things currently are, so do we need an entire category devoted to t...') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this category really necessary? I mean, unless the articles say otherwise, they ''already'' talk about how things currently are, so do we need an entire category devoted to telling readers that the article is, indeed, saying how things are? It's redundancy incarnate. If there's changes for .40d#, then they can be put in their own category. Otherwise, virtually every single line of pretty much every single article currently on the wiki would belong in this category. --[[User:LegacyCWAL|LegacyCWAL]] 18:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | Is this category really necessary? I mean, unless the articles say otherwise, they ''already'' talk about how things currently are, so do we need an entire category devoted to telling readers that the article is, indeed, saying how things are? It's redundancy incarnate. If there's changes for .40d#, then they can be put in their own category. Otherwise, virtually every single line of pretty much every single article currently on the wiki would belong in this category. --[[User:LegacyCWAL|LegacyCWAL]] 18:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :It might be useful for things specific to this particular version. It might also become more relevant when a new version becomes available... --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 18:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 6 July 2009
Is this category really necessary? I mean, unless the articles say otherwise, they already talk about how things currently are, so do we need an entire category devoted to telling readers that the article is, indeed, saying how things are? It's redundancy incarnate. If there's changes for .40d#, then they can be put in their own category. Otherwise, virtually every single line of pretty much every single article currently on the wiki would belong in this category. --LegacyCWAL 18:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- It might be useful for things specific to this particular version. It might also become more relevant when a new version becomes available... --Corona688 18:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)