v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Furniture industry"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Furniture Industry to [[Talk:40d:Furniture Industry]]: 40d namespace migration)
m (moved Talk:Broken/40d\x3aFurniture Industry to 40d Talk:Furniture Industry: Fixing talk page name (278/738))
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:46, 8 March 2010

This page shouldn't exist, industries are named for the input product or only cover one input material, the whole diagram is useless in my opinion.unsigned comment by 24.198.25.175

I gotta agree - it's not an "industry", it's a trade item at best, and hardly complex enough to warrant its own discussion. I'm trying to think of something that's as simple, but almost everything else involves a mid-product - this is "Take X, Y or Z, produce furniture from X, Y or Z, and you have X- Y- or Z- type furniture". We could lose this and never look back. User:Albedo, late Sep 27, 09 - (who gets suspicious of IP numbers floating around in public).
A table of specific furniture and what materials they can be made out of might be the useful thing here. This flowchart makes it look like you can make stone buckets, barrels, and bins. Cheepicus 09:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
<nods> It also looks like "decorated furniture" is a parallel option to making regular furniture, where the "decoration industry" should be a separate, optional stage after this. The page history says "from old wiki" - maybe this was made for a diff version, or maybe it just wasn't completely thought out, but it's not valid as it stands (and I, for one, have zero interest in reworking it so it lives up to its marginal potential). It's just not something that needs a diagram to be explained or "better understood". It's just not... (what is the word?...) ...oh!... "useful".--Albedo 18:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)