v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Elephant"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Then I think Unicorns may have taken their place; in a way they're even worse because they went about slaughtering a bunch of elves without any provocation at all. --[[User:BDR|BDR]] 14:07, 31 October 2007 (EDT) | ::Then I think Unicorns may have taken their place; in a way they're even worse because they went about slaughtering a bunch of elves without any provocation at all. --[[User:BDR|BDR]] 14:07, 31 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh, the irony of that, eh? | ||
Revision as of 19:20, 31 October 2007
I changed the line about cave features, but left the rest alone. Are there any other parts that are no longer accurate in this version?--BahamutZERO 15:07, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
Someone told me that Toady mentioned he had toned down the elephant aggressivness in one of his daily dev posts, does anyone know anything more about that? I don't want to end up having put up a completely out-of-date article. :P --BahamutZERO 15:58, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
- Elephants seem totally non-agressive now, I don't know if they even defend themselves when attacked. I had a dwarven caravan guard slaughter 3 of them without a single wound, all the elephants did was run even when the dwarf was right next to them. Of course, the dwarf guards have steel instead of iron now, but still, I think elephants are no longer a real threat. --BurnedToast 02:55, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
- Then I think Unicorns may have taken their place; in a way they're even worse because they went about slaughtering a bunch of elves without any provocation at all. --BDR 14:07, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
Oh, the irony of that, eh?