v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Security design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | :'''Editors & Contributors''' - Please include diagrams or ''clear'' and well-sized [[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Images images]] if appropriate. For diagrams, use [[Character table|standard Dwarf Fortress symbols]] for your diagrams - an x is an up/down stairwell, a ╬ is a fortification, a ▲ is an up-ramp/slope, etc. etc. For screenshots, use the standard tileset, not a custom one that few may recognize. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Please do NOT add a "theoretical" trap design, that you have not actually tested, unless you are 100% sure it will work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :If your suggestion is lengthy and complex, consider placing it on your User: page with simpler explanation and a link here. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Lastly, if you can keep similar or alternate suggestions grouped within like subsections/topics/categories, that would be a good thing. Future wiki users and DF players thank you. | ||
| + | |||
=='Security' vs 'Defense' Design== | =='Security' vs 'Defense' Design== | ||
Having a 'defense design' and 'defense guide' article was ridiculous name-wise. This one was about how to make your layout better defense-wise, so 'security' seemed an appropriate kind-of-synonym. Already managed the redirects so it links up to the 40d Defense Guide (and it to this page) fine. --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 00:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | Having a 'defense design' and 'defense guide' article was ridiculous name-wise. This one was about how to make your layout better defense-wise, so 'security' seemed an appropriate kind-of-synonym. Already managed the redirects so it links up to the 40d Defense Guide (and it to this page) fine. --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 00:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:This makes great sense. I was messing with these articles earlier today and wasn't quite sure what to do with the dual defense articles. Nice work.--[[User:JohnnyMadhouse|JohnnyMadhouse]] 00:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | :This makes great sense. I was messing with these articles earlier today and wasn't quite sure what to do with the dual defense articles. Nice work.--[[User:JohnnyMadhouse|JohnnyMadhouse]] 00:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Yeah, the chief difference was that 'guide' was an overview and 'design' was supposed to be architectural defense style. This was the only other word combination I could find that didn't mean either the same thing or "maek ur fort look prettay 101" --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 01:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:03, 12 April 2010
- Editors & Contributors - Please include diagrams or clear and well-sized http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Images images if appropriate. For diagrams, use standard Dwarf Fortress symbols for your diagrams - an x is an up/down stairwell, a ╬ is a fortification, a ▲ is an up-ramp/slope, etc. etc. For screenshots, use the standard tileset, not a custom one that few may recognize.
- Please do NOT add a "theoretical" trap design, that you have not actually tested, unless you are 100% sure it will work.
- If your suggestion is lengthy and complex, consider placing it on your User: page with simpler explanation and a link here.
- Lastly, if you can keep similar or alternate suggestions grouped within like subsections/topics/categories, that would be a good thing. Future wiki users and DF players thank you.
'Security' vs 'Defense' Design
Having a 'defense design' and 'defense guide' article was ridiculous name-wise. This one was about how to make your layout better defense-wise, so 'security' seemed an appropriate kind-of-synonym. Already managed the redirects so it links up to the 40d Defense Guide (and it to this page) fine. --Retro 00:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- This makes great sense. I was messing with these articles earlier today and wasn't quite sure what to do with the dual defense articles. Nice work.--JohnnyMadhouse 00:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, the chief difference was that 'guide' was an overview and 'design' was supposed to be architectural defense style. This was the only other word combination I could find that didn't mean either the same thing or "maek ur fort look prettay 101" --Retro 01:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)