- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Quality"
m (Not every article with things in it should be called fine, and not every near empty article should be called tattered) |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
* May be a stub article | * May be a stub article | ||
* Lacks information | * Lacks information | ||
| − | |||
* Contains inaccurate information | * Contains inaccurate information | ||
* Is not categorized | * Is not categorized | ||
| Line 59: | Line 58: | ||
==Fine== | ==Fine== | ||
[[:Category:Fine Quality Articles|Fine Quality Articles]] have many of the following characteristics: | [[:Category:Fine Quality Articles|Fine Quality Articles]] have many of the following characteristics: | ||
| − | |||
* Has a substantial number of redlinks, very few links or no links at all | * Has a substantial number of redlinks, very few links or no links at all | ||
* Contains little to no inaccurate information | * Contains little to no inaccurate information | ||
* Contains some information that needs to be verified | * Contains some information that needs to be verified | ||
| − | |||
To insert this template, type <nowiki>{{Quality|Fine}}</nowiki> anywhere in the page. | To insert this template, type <nowiki>{{Quality|Fine}}</nowiki> anywhere in the page. | ||
Revision as of 21:02, 20 May 2010
| 50.14 | 0.28.181.40d | 0.23.130.23a | |
| Tattered | Division by zero.% (0) | 2.7% (32) | 0% (0) |
| Fine | Division by zero.% (0) | 46.7% (563) | 57.6% (414) |
| Exceptional | Division by zero.% (0) | 38.3% (462) | 37.1% (267) |
| Masterwork | Division by zero.% (0) | 5.4% (65) | 0.8% (6) |
| Unknown | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Total | 0 | 1206 | 719 |
| Rating | Division by zero. out of 100 | 75.6 out of 100 | 73.6 out of 100 |
Unknown
Unknown Quality Articles have been tagged with a quality level not recognized by the wiki, whether accidentally (incorrect spelling or capitalization) or intentionally (to request that somebody else rate the article).
If you encounter these, please evaluate and rate them according to the criteria below.
Tattered
Tattered Quality Articles have many of the following characteristics:
- May be a stub article
- Lacks information
- Contains inaccurate information
- Is not categorized
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Tattered}} anywhere in the page.
Fine
Fine Quality Articles have many of the following characteristics:
- Has a substantial number of redlinks, very few links or no links at all
- Contains little to no inaccurate information
- Contains some information that needs to be verified
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Fine}} anywhere in the page.
Exceptional
Exceptional Quality Articles have ALL of the following characteristics:
- Is properly categorized
- Has a decent amount of information
- Has all appropriate templates
- DOES NOT have any pink text at the bottom of the Article Version template (these indicate some kind of problem; for details, view the Template:ArticleVersion page)
- Is properly/sufficiently linked to other articles
- Contains no inaccurate information
and most of the following characteristics:
- May contain some redlinks
- But most links are functional
- May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified
- Has multiple editors
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Exceptional}} anywhere in the page.
Masterwork
Masterwork Quality Articles are the best of the best. Masterwork quality articles have ALL of the following characteristics:
- Is comprehensive on the subject
- Contains no unverified information
- Has an appropriate number of outbound links
- No redlinks are present
- Links only contain links of type {{l|linkname}} except where a link to another namespace is required
- Is properly categorized
- The article has multiple editors
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Masterwork}} anywhere in the page.