- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Quality"
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| '''{{Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki:Quality/rating|23a}} out of 100''' | | '''{{Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki:Quality/rating|23a}} out of 100''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Quality Template Problems== | ||
| + | Quality templates should include a timestamp to let us gauge how old a rating is. Quality ratings that do not have proper timestamps are in [[:Category:Quality ranks without proper timestamps]]. Quality templates that were placed more than 10 weeks ago (and thus should be re-ranked) are in [[:Category:Quality ranks older than 10 weeks]]. | ||
==Unknown== | ==Unknown== | ||
Revision as of 08:31, 22 May 2010
| 50.14 | 0.28.181.40d | 0.23.130.23a | |
| Tattered | Division by zero.% (0) | 2.7% (32) | 0% (0) |
| Fine | Division by zero.% (0) | 46.7% (563) | 57.6% (414) |
| Exceptional | Division by zero.% (0) | 38.3% (462) | 37.1% (267) |
| Masterwork | Division by zero.% (0) | 5.4% (65) | 0.8% (6) |
| Unknown | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Total | 0 | 1206 | 719 |
| Rating | Division by zero. out of 100 | 75.6 out of 100 | 73.6 out of 100 |
Quality Template Problems
Quality templates should include a timestamp to let us gauge how old a rating is. Quality ratings that do not have proper timestamps are in Category:Quality ranks without proper timestamps. Quality templates that were placed more than 10 weeks ago (and thus should be re-ranked) are in Category:Quality ranks older than 10 weeks.
Unknown
Unknown Quality Articles have been tagged with a quality level not recognized by the wiki, whether accidentally (incorrect spelling or capitalization) or intentionally (to request that somebody else rate the article).
If you encounter these, please evaluate and rate them according to the criteria below.
Tattered
Tattered Quality Articles have many of the following characteristics:
- May be a stub article
- Lacks information
- Contains inaccurate information
- Is not categorized
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Tattered|~~~~~}} anywhere in the page.
Fine
Fine Quality Articles have many of the following characteristics:
- Has a substantial number of redlinks, very few links or no links at all
- Contains little to no inaccurate information
- Contains some information that needs to be verified
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Fine|~~~~~}} anywhere in the page.
Exceptional
Exceptional Quality Articles have ALL of the following characteristics:
- Is properly categorized
- Has a decent amount of information
- Has all appropriate templates
- DOES NOT have any pink text at the bottom of the Article Version template (these indicate some kind of problem; for details, view the Template:ArticleVersion page)
- Is properly/sufficiently linked to other articles
- Contains no inaccurate information
and most of the following characteristics:
- May contain some redlinks
- But most links are functional
- May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified
- Has multiple editors
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Exceptional|~~~~~}} anywhere in the page.
Masterwork
Masterwork Quality Articles are the best of the best. Masterwork quality articles have ALL of the following characteristics:
- Is comprehensive on the subject
- Contains no unverified information
- Has an appropriate number of outbound links
- No redlinks are present
- Links only contain links of type {{l|linkname}} except where a link to another namespace is required
- Is properly categorized
- The article has multiple editors
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Masterwork|~~~~~}} anywhere in the page.