v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.34 Talk:Trading/Flowchart"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Created page with 'Flowchart Quality This should be cleaned up if possible. --~~~~') |
m (I thought it was noble, not trader...) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Flowchart Quality | Flowchart Quality | ||
This should be cleaned up if possible. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 17:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | This should be cleaned up if possible. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 17:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Dangerous liaisons == | ||
| + | Doesn't the liaison talk to the highest ranking noble (such as expedition leader, mayor, baron, duke), rather than the trader? Yes, they may often be one-and-the-same dwarf, but in the current state, this chart is incorrect. If we add "expedition leader" it will also badly screw up the formatting of this table - suggestions? [[User:Kalon|Kalon]] 05:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:01, 14 October 2011
Flowchart Quality This should be cleaned up if possible. --Briess 17:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Dangerous liaisons
Doesn't the liaison talk to the highest ranking noble (such as expedition leader, mayor, baron, duke), rather than the trader? Yes, they may often be one-and-the-same dwarf, but in the current state, this chart is incorrect. If we add "expedition leader" it will also badly screw up the formatting of this table - suggestions? Kalon 05:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)