v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.34 Talk:Dragon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The "dragon size" paragraph claims a gradual growth of the dragons, but the raws only state a body size each for age 0 and one for age 1000, leading me to believe that they'd jum...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The "dragon size" paragraph claims a gradual growth of the dragons, but the raws only state a body size each for age 0 and one for age 1000, leading me to believe that they'd jump from their initial size 6000 right up to 25000000 as "soon" as they hit age 1000. Is there anything supporting the gradual growth claim made in the article? | The "dragon size" paragraph claims a gradual growth of the dragons, but the raws only state a body size each for age 0 and one for age 1000, leading me to believe that they'd jump from their initial size 6000 right up to 25000000 as "soon" as they hit age 1000. Is there anything supporting the gradual growth claim made in the article? | ||
--[[User:Syndic|Syndic]] 00:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | --[[User:Syndic|Syndic]] 00:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :size growths are linear, period. starting from the lowest indicated value to the highest. there has to be at least one, i think...but in that case the creature will be listed size at birth if just one size indicator exists. i believe the paragraph is just trying to give a scope example. [[Special:Contributions/96.15.140.46|96.15.140.46]] 06:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:18, 1 April 2012
The "dragon size" paragraph claims a gradual growth of the dragons, but the raws only state a body size each for age 0 and one for age 1000, leading me to believe that they'd jump from their initial size 6000 right up to 25000000 as "soon" as they hit age 1000. Is there anything supporting the gradual growth claim made in the article? --Syndic 00:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- size growths are linear, period. starting from the lowest indicated value to the highest. there has to be at least one, i think...but in that case the creature will be listed size at birth if just one size indicator exists. i believe the paragraph is just trying to give a scope example. 96.15.140.46 06:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)