v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.34 Talk:Workshop"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Seikatsukan (talk | contribs) (My two dwarfbucks.) |
(→Rabble rabble!: new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think the tier system is very useful. A better organization, if there needs to be an organization at all, would be by industry. [[User:HammerDave|HammerDave]] 00:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC) | I don't think the tier system is very useful. A better organization, if there needs to be an organization at all, would be by industry. [[User:HammerDave|HammerDave]] 00:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I agree that the current tier system is a confusing mess. However, given the complexity of DF's industry, pretty much any attempt at making a single graph or table that accurately encompasses it all '''will''' be a confusing mess; succeeding at also making it easy to read would immediately elevate your Wikicrafting skill to Legendary+5 level. And some workshops are used in several different industries, inter alia, the butcher's shop produces bones for crafts and ammo, meat for feeding your dwarves, and leather for armor and crafts. Also, [[furnace]] could be merged with this page so every "dwarf-operated building that produces things" would be in one page. Personally, I'd just remove the tiers entirely and leave the items used and produced by each workshop, sorted alphabetically. --[[User:Seikatsukan|Seikatsukan]] 01:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC) | :I agree that the current tier system is a confusing mess. However, given the complexity of DF's industry, pretty much any attempt at making a single graph or table that accurately encompasses it all '''will''' be a confusing mess; succeeding at also making it easy to read would immediately elevate your Wikicrafting skill to Legendary+5 level. And some workshops are used in several different industries, inter alia, the butcher's shop produces bones for crafts and ammo, meat for feeding your dwarves, and leather for armor and crafts. Also, [[furnace]] could be merged with this page so every "dwarf-operated building that produces things" would be in one page. Personally, I'd just remove the tiers entirely and leave the items used and produced by each workshop, sorted alphabetically. --[[User:Seikatsukan|Seikatsukan]] 01:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Rabble rabble! == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The tier system isn't even in the game. I think all mentions of 'tiers' should be removed, it's more confusing than what's actually in the game. --[[User:Richards|Richards]] 14:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:10, 15 June 2012
I don't think the tier system is very useful. A better organization, if there needs to be an organization at all, would be by industry. HammerDave 00:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- I agree that the current tier system is a confusing mess. However, given the complexity of DF's industry, pretty much any attempt at making a single graph or table that accurately encompasses it all will be a confusing mess; succeeding at also making it easy to read would immediately elevate your Wikicrafting skill to Legendary+5 level. And some workshops are used in several different industries, inter alia, the butcher's shop produces bones for crafts and ammo, meat for feeding your dwarves, and leather for armor and crafts. Also, furnace could be merged with this page so every "dwarf-operated building that produces things" would be in one page. Personally, I'd just remove the tiers entirely and leave the items used and produced by each workshop, sorted alphabetically. --Seikatsukan 01:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Rabble rabble!
The tier system isn't even in the game. I think all mentions of 'tiers' should be removed, it's more confusing than what's actually in the game. --Richards 14:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)