v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:%s"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Thanks for the explanation. I use Firefox and didn't even know that feature existed! By the way, if we're going to keep the redirect, then the del template doesn't belong here at all, so I deleted it along with your explanatory comment from below. --[[User:Peristarkawan|Peristarkawan]] 19:13, 7 November 2007 (EST) | :Thanks for the explanation. I use Firefox and didn't even know that feature existed! By the way, if we're going to keep the redirect, then the del template doesn't belong here at all, so I deleted it along with your explanatory comment from below. --[[User:Peristarkawan|Peristarkawan]] 19:13, 7 November 2007 (EST) | ||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 00:15, 8 November 2007
Does this page serve a purpose, or was it just a mistake? --Peristarkawan 21:25, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
Yes it does, it's a redirect to the main page which is used on several wikis, it is the default search term and is used by people who use firefox, look for it on wikipedia and see what happens, look at encyclopedia dramatica and see what happens. Klichka 18:46, 7 November 2007 (EST)
I conclude by saying that if it is good enough for wikipedia, it is good enough for DFwiki. All default null string searches from keywords go to the main page like this rather than junking due to the way Firefox works. This is a valuable feature. Especially for people who setup a keyword for the search box. Klichka 18:48, 7 November 2007 (EST)
- Thanks for the explanation. I use Firefox and didn't even know that feature existed! By the way, if we're going to keep the redirect, then the del template doesn't belong here at all, so I deleted it along with your explanatory comment from below. --Peristarkawan 19:13, 7 November 2007 (EST)