v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.34 Talk:Finished goods"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Mugs== Mugs are also heavier, so in my experience crafts are much more productive. How should this be reflected in the article? ~~~~") |
(→Cut Glass/Gems: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Mugs== | ==Mugs== | ||
Mugs are also heavier, so in my experience crafts are much more productive. How should this be reflected in the article? [[User:Dree12|Dree12]] 02:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC) | Mugs are also heavier, so in my experience crafts are much more productive. How should this be reflected in the article? [[User:Dree12|Dree12]] 02:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Cut Glass/Gems == | ||
| + | |||
| + | in v0.31 there was a discussion about glass- and gem-crafts, the footnote to the table still "refers" to it but the link does not work. Should the discussion be moved over to the new namespace, or a small section be written in the article itself? | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 6 November 2012
Mugs
Mugs are also heavier, so in my experience crafts are much more productive. How should this be reflected in the article? Dree12 02:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Cut Glass/Gems
in v0.31 there was a discussion about glass- and gem-crafts, the footnote to the table still "refers" to it but the link does not work. Should the discussion be moved over to the new namespace, or a small section be written in the article itself?