v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lethosor/rater.js"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I get a "Rating Utility:Stonesense ... Invalid page ... This page is in an invalid namespace. You can view this page's rating anyway or close this window." error when I try to rate any page in the Utility namespace. [[User:PeridexisErrant|PeridexisErrant]] ([[User talk:PeridexisErrant|talk]]) 13:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC) | I get a "Rating Utility:Stonesense ... Invalid page ... This page is in an invalid namespace. You can view this page's rating anyway or close this window." error when I try to rate any page in the Utility namespace. [[User:PeridexisErrant|PeridexisErrant]] ([[User talk:PeridexisErrant|talk]]) 13:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
:That's because {{tl|quality}} doesn't support pages in the Utility namespace, which is most likely left over from the old rating system. It does make sense to let utility articles be rated, though, so I'll add that in. Thanks! --[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 13:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC) | :That's because {{tl|quality}} doesn't support pages in the Utility namespace, which is most likely left over from the old rating system. It does make sense to let utility articles be rated, though, so I'll add that in. Thanks! --[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 13:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :This is now implemented in the script. --[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 13:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:58, 28 September 2013
This rating script is currently being developed, and is still in a beta version. If you encounter issues, or would like to leave feedback, you can leave a message here. You can also:
- Report an issue in the GitHub issue tracker.
- Use the feedback reporter to leave a message, if you're unfamiliar with wiki syntax (see here for help with talk pages, like this one).
I get a "Rating Utility:Stonesense ... Invalid page ... This page is in an invalid namespace. You can view this page's rating anyway or close this window." error when I try to rate any page in the Utility namespace. PeridexisErrant (talk) 13:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's because {{quality}} doesn't support pages in the Utility namespace, which is most likely left over from the old rating system. It does make sense to let utility articles be rated, though, so I'll add that in. Thanks! --Lethosor (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- This is now implemented in the script. --Lethosor (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)