User talk:Lethosor/rater.js

This rating script is currently being developed, and is still in a beta version. If you encounter issues, or would like to leave feedback, you can leave a message here. You can also:

• Report an issue in the GitHub issue tracker.
• Use the feedback reporter to leave a message, if you're unfamiliar with wiki syntax (see here for help with talk pages, like this one).

{ "watch": true, "triggers": [["section","Feedback"],["tab"]] }

---

I get a "Rating Utility:Stonesense ... Invalid page ... This page is in an invalid namespace. You can view this page's rating anyway or close this window." error when I try to rate any page in the Utility namespace. PeridexisErrant (talk) 13:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

That's because {{quality}} doesn't support pages in the Utility namespace, which is most likely left over from the old rating system. It does make sense to let utility articles be rated, though, so I'll add that in. Thanks! --Lethosor (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

This is now implemented in the script. --Lethosor (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

...and the quality template now works as well. --Lethosor (talk) 14:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

New issue: when rating Human, I thought it deserved exceptional, but the script showed masterwork and didn't let me override downwards. Further tests as I was rating utility pages (thanks) show that the override function may not be working at all - it just shows the description of the current quality level. PeridexisErrant (talk) 01:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

I really should make that clearer... it's supposed to let you choose the rating by clicking on it, but it's hard to figure that out from what it displays. I'll work on making that more obvious. --Lethosor (talk) 01:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)