v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "File talk:FlowchartDF.png"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Proposed move: new section) |
(→Proposed move: (rsp)) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think this should probably be moved to [[:File:Quickstart flowchart.png]], since it goes with the quickstart guide best. There are a [[Special:Whatlinkshere/File:FlowchartDF.png|couple other pages]] besides the quickstart guide that include this image, and I think they fit better with the older version. Any opinions? —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 18:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | I think this should probably be moved to [[:File:Quickstart flowchart.png]], since it goes with the quickstart guide best. There are a [[Special:Whatlinkshere/File:FlowchartDF.png|couple other pages]] besides the quickstart guide that include this image, and I think they fit better with the older version. Any opinions? —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 18:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree, in the sense this is a differently-designed flowchart and as such, would deserve it's own page (as with all pictures that significantly alter their contents after revision). The articles may have references to the older flowchart that aren't reflected properly on this new version.--[[User:Doktoro Reichard|Doktoro Reichard]] ([[User talk:Doktoro Reichard|talk]]) 19:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:52, 22 January 2014
Proposed move
I think this should probably be moved to File:Quickstart flowchart.png, since it goes with the quickstart guide best. There are a couple other pages besides the quickstart guide that include this image, and I think they fit better with the older version. Any opinions? —Lethosor (talk) 18:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
I agree, in the sense this is a differently-designed flowchart and as such, would deserve it's own page (as with all pictures that significantly alter their contents after revision). The articles may have references to the older flowchart that aren't reflected properly on this new version.--Doktoro Reichard (talk) 19:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
