v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "DF2014 Talk:Density"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== "Candy" spoilers == Attempting to hide categorical information about materials under joking nicknames seems to be a bad idea. Having the name of this material listed in th...") |
m (Forgot to sign.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== "Candy" spoilers == | == "Candy" spoilers == | ||
| − | Attempting to hide categorical information about materials under joking nicknames seems to be a bad idea. Having the name of this material listed in the article provides no spoiler-ish content, as far as I can see, given that it discloses nothing about the nature of the material or its interaction with spoilers, but rather simply that it exists, and it has density. The same goes for [[Magma-safe|this]] article, but I'd hate to be redundant. Can anyone provide a valid reason why this ''shouldn't'' be Adamantine instead of "Candy"? | + | Attempting to hide categorical information about materials under joking nicknames seems to be a bad idea. Having the name of this material listed in the article provides no spoiler-ish content, as far as I can see, given that it discloses nothing about the nature of the material or its interaction with spoilers, but rather simply that it exists, and it has density. The same goes for [[Magma-safe|this]] article, but I'd hate to be redundant. Can anyone provide a valid reason why this ''shouldn't'' be Adamantine instead of "Candy"? [[User:CalmBit|CalmBit]] ([[User talk:CalmBit|talk]]) 23:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:03, 30 November 2017
"Candy" spoilers
Attempting to hide categorical information about materials under joking nicknames seems to be a bad idea. Having the name of this material listed in the article provides no spoiler-ish content, as far as I can see, given that it discloses nothing about the nature of the material or its interaction with spoilers, but rather simply that it exists, and it has density. The same goes for this article, but I'd hate to be redundant. Can anyone provide a valid reason why this shouldn't be Adamantine instead of "Candy"? CalmBit (talk) 23:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)