- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "DF2014 Talk:Amethyst man"
Number 055 (talk | contribs) |
Number 055 (talk | contribs) (I should probably use preview more.) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| − | - I suppose you've got me there. I'll revert the page back to your latest edit. | + | - I suppose you've got me there. I'll revert the page back to your latest edit. |
| − | + | ||
| + | Also, I noticed that a lot of the pages you linked have very short DfD sections, many as short as one sentence. Maybe they should get expanded upon if possible. | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 15 April 2018
- Do you (the latest contributor) suggest that there shouldn't be any of these kinds of jokes at all? I'd say that is the point of the D for Dwarf tagging, along with a few non-canon dwarven tales and meta-jokes. As long as the D for Dwarf parts are sufficiently separated from the main article so to not cause confusion I see no problems with this.
I've re-added the erased content for now. --Voliol (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- D for Dwarf sections are supposed to be funny to anyone who has played the game. This one is only funny to people who watched Steven Universe. --Number 055 (talk) 02:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- To quote the D for Dwarf banner. "...if you miss some of the references, don't worry. It was inevitable."
While it does say that references to the Bay12 Forums are viable for D for Dwarf sections, it doesn't say anything about references to other media being banned for that reason. Also, quite a few other animal men pages and a few others have D for Dwarf sections referencing to various other media. Why only remove it from this very page? (Note that this is not a challenge to remove all those as well, so please don't, it'd be a mess to restore later.)
I will hold off on restoring this page for a few days, while awaiting your response. --Voliol (talk) 08:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- I suppose you've got me there. I'll revert the page back to your latest edit.
Also, I noticed that a lot of the pages you linked have very short DfD sections, many as short as one sentence. Maybe they should get expanded upon if possible.