v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Fluffy wambler"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So we are using a picture of a pokemon as a picture? ([[User:Keilden|Keilden]] 05:42, 20 November 2007 (EST)) | So we are using a picture of a pokemon as a picture? ([[User:Keilden|Keilden]] 05:42, 20 November 2007 (EST)) | ||
| + | : Yes. Yes we are. --[[User:GauHelldragon|GauHelldragon]] 13:17, 20 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 20 November 2007
This should not simply be deleted. Why not make this a redirect to a relevant page? --Turgid Bolk 16:33, 13 November 2007 (EST)
- I agree. This page contains useful and interesting information, and should not be deleted. There doesn't seem to be a relevant page into which this information can be merged. Perhaps it would be worth creating a 'List of vermin' page? Either way, I'll leave it for now, and if nobody disagrees with this then I'll remove the deletion tag. --Morlark
- I think I found what a fluffy wambler is. He's fluffy, right?Schm0 21:35, 13 November 2007 (EST)
- I agree that there should be a 'List of vermin' page, with some tidbits of information on each (habitat, alignment, edibility) and that this page shouldn't be deleted until it can be made a redirect. --Alfador 00:38, 14 November 2007 (EST)
So we are using a picture of a pokemon as a picture? (Keilden 05:42, 20 November 2007 (EST))
- Yes. Yes we are. --GauHelldragon 13:17, 20 November 2007 (EST)