v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Experience"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:: Heh. On the Real Wiki, it's right about now that you'd be shot down for doing primary research! [[User:Runspotrun|Runspotrun]] 14:17, 1 December 2007 (EST) | :: Heh. On the Real Wiki, it's right about now that you'd be shot down for doing primary research! [[User:Runspotrun|Runspotrun]] 14:17, 1 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: Then we're the exact opposite of them: primary research is 99% of what we post. (The rest being essentially divine scripture--verifiably from the creator of the subject of our wiki.) --[[User:Alfador|Alfador]] 12:21, 6 February 2008 (EST) | ||
"...but 27% of the time when Legendary+5, based off of a random d20 roll." | "...but 27% of the time when Legendary+5, based off of a random d20 roll." | ||
Revision as of 17:21, 6 February 2008
Until experience points have been re-verified, this page should be marked as having been copied from the old Wiki. I don't know how to do that and am too tired to research it right now.
I will add that I intend to re-verify experience fairly soon. —0x517A5D 02:52, 14 November 2007 (EST)
- Done VengefulDonut 09:42, 14 November 2007 (EST)
- Since I had a pile of Adamantine around, I decided to do the Extraction experiment. It took a dwarf who had never extracted adamantine before 17 iterations to reach novice. That makes it more than 29 and at most 32 xp per action. I expect that it's a 30xp task, like so many others. Doctorlucky 05:07, 14 November 2007 (EST)
- I've now taken the dwarf to named level (Strand Extractor) with exactly 37 tasks, so it's 30xp. Doctorlucky 18:14, 14 November 2007 (EST)
- Heh. On the Real Wiki, it's right about now that you'd be shot down for doing primary research! Runspotrun 14:17, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- Then we're the exact opposite of them: primary research is 99% of what we post. (The rest being essentially divine scripture--verifiably from the creator of the subject of our wiki.) --Alfador 12:21, 6 February 2008 (EST)
"...but 27% of the time when Legendary+5, based off of a random d20 roll."
27% on a d20? You mean like rolling a 5.4 and below? I'm curious how one can roll higher than a 5 and lower than a 6 on an integer-numbered die.--Draco18s 17:41, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- Rather easy when you consider that more than one test should be done and 27% ends up being the average. Odds are that if the game actually uses a d20 roll, then the programmed average is 25% with 2% margin of error in the experiment, well within acceptable margin. --Edward 18:20, 1 February 2008 (EST)
Mining and legendary +1,+2, ect.
Do miners get any bonus for reaching legendary +1-5? --Heliopios 14:55, 1 December 2007 (EST)
- a legendary+5 will be faster than a legendary, but I don't know if that is just because of the 5 stat bumps that all classes get for moving from legendary to legendary+5. I may look into it, but no promises.
—0x517A5D 22:53, 3 December 2007 (EST)