- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Department of Dwarven Veteran's Affairs"
Frostedfire (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The author page - that's the one linked to by my signature isn't it? | The author page - that's the one linked to by my signature isn't it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | This fine article and this discussion gave me idea about a "shadow" wiki. For most popular topics - make a default serious article (as is now for most topics) and make a clearly marked, unified style links at the top of some pages to "shadow" variants that would state basically the same things as the original but in a creative tongue in cheek words. Of course only "shadow" article should be allowed to wiki-link to other "shadow" articles.--[[User:Another|Another]] 04:15, 14 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 09:15, 14 December 2007
Genius! A masterwork idea! Noctis 09:49, 11 December 2007 (EST)
This is destined to be deleted. I'm not sure why anyone goes to the trouble of writing a creative work in this space. Should be moved to the author's page. --Geofferic 19:04, 12 December 2007 (EST)
Hilarious! You should start your own section of these under your author page. A tongue in cheek guide to dwarf fortress. Calculus 19:06, 12 December 2007 (EST)
You shoulda seen the old wiki - before the agents of poo-taaa-tooo, PO-TA-TO! turned up and made it uniformatted. Good example would be discussing the old-skool lumberjack "cutting himself down trees" :P --Frostedfire 02:48, 14 December 2007 (EST)
The author page - that's the one linked to by my signature isn't it?
This fine article and this discussion gave me idea about a "shadow" wiki. For most popular topics - make a default serious article (as is now for most topics) and make a clearly marked, unified style links at the top of some pages to "shadow" variants that would state basically the same things as the original but in a creative tongue in cheek words. Of course only "shadow" article should be allowed to wiki-link to other "shadow" articles.--Another 04:15, 14 December 2007 (EST)