v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki talk:Wikiproject verify"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Project:Wikiproject verify is a link to this article. The "Project:" header (namespace?) has been replaced by DwarfFortressWiki, so I don't think we need "wikiproject" in the page name...) |
(+) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Am I alone in this? Anyone else agree?<br> | Am I alone in this? Anyone else agree?<br> | ||
--[[User:Savok|Savok]] 10:50, 11 December 2008 (EST) | --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 10:50, 11 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :Well, on wikipedia, the Project: namespace is replaced with Wikipedia:, and there are lots of "Wikipedia:Wikiproject something" pages - though those are usually more related to subject areas (so for example if we had a group for maintaining all creature articles, or all skills/labors, or the FAQ) than something like this. I do agree that ''this'' shouldn't be "Wikiproject", but not for the same reason - more that it doesn't line up with what I think of a wikiproject as being than due to a problem with the term itself [[User:Random832|Random832]] 10:57, 11 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:57, 11 December 2008
Project:Wikiproject verify is a link to this article. The "Project:" header (namespace?) has been replaced by DwarfFortressWiki, so I don't think we need "wikiproject" in the page name.
Am I alone in this? Anyone else agree?
--Savok 10:50, 11 December 2008 (EST)
- Well, on wikipedia, the Project: namespace is replaced with Wikipedia:, and there are lots of "Wikipedia:Wikiproject something" pages - though those are usually more related to subject areas (so for example if we had a group for maintaining all creature articles, or all skills/labors, or the FAQ) than something like this. I do agree that this shouldn't be "Wikiproject", but not for the same reason - more that it doesn't line up with what I think of a wikiproject as being than due to a problem with the term itself Random832 10:57, 11 December 2008 (EST)