- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mrdudeguy"
m (Created page with '==Recent Edits to Chalk, Limestone== "Also contains many profitable ores and gems which make it ideal for exploratory mining. " (Mrdudeguy) True. But are you going to add that...') |
m (format) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Recent Edits to Chalk, Limestone== | ==Recent Edits to Chalk, Limestone== | ||
| − | "Also contains many profitable ores and gems which make it ideal for exploratory mining. " (Mrdudeguy) | + | ''"Also contains many profitable ores and gems which make it ideal for exploratory mining."'' (Mrdudeguy) |
True. But are you going to add that to every sedimentary stone's page, since the same is true for all? While the wiki is partially based on experience, it's also based on the game code. "Sedimentary" speaks for itself (or does if anyone bothers to find that link.) While the sidebar carries the same info, imo this is not overly redundant, because it spells it out for newbies - but be thorough. What's true for limestone is also true for mudstone and conglomerate and etc., even if they aren't as exciting. (I just did something similar with every "layer" stone, which prev had zero text to explain why they were notable.) --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 03:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | True. But are you going to add that to every sedimentary stone's page, since the same is true for all? While the wiki is partially based on experience, it's also based on the game code. "Sedimentary" speaks for itself (or does if anyone bothers to find that link.) While the sidebar carries the same info, imo this is not overly redundant, because it spells it out for newbies - but be thorough. What's true for limestone is also true for mudstone and conglomerate and etc., even if they aren't as exciting. (I just did something similar with every "layer" stone, which prev had zero text to explain why they were notable.) --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 03:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:22, 10 May 2009
Recent Edits to Chalk, Limestone
"Also contains many profitable ores and gems which make it ideal for exploratory mining." (Mrdudeguy)
True. But are you going to add that to every sedimentary stone's page, since the same is true for all? While the wiki is partially based on experience, it's also based on the game code. "Sedimentary" speaks for itself (or does if anyone bothers to find that link.) While the sidebar carries the same info, imo this is not overly redundant, because it spells it out for newbies - but be thorough. What's true for limestone is also true for mudstone and conglomerate and etc., even if they aren't as exciting. (I just did something similar with every "layer" stone, which prev had zero text to explain why they were notable.) --Albedo 03:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)