v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Slate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'I would say that this is one of the worst layer stones - of the few ores it possibly contains, it contains few to nothing --~~~~') |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would say that this is one of the worst layer stones - of the few ores it possibly contains, it contains few to nothing --[[User:Höhlenschreck|Höhlenschreck]] 23:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | I would say that this is one of the worst layer stones - of the few ores it possibly contains, it contains few to nothing --[[User:Höhlenschreck|Höhlenschreck]] 23:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :<nods> Not all stones are built alike (and no two examples will be the same). Granite is clearly one of the superior layers, both for its richness and variety. Rhyolite and some others are consistently disappointing, in my experience anyway. It would be interesting to analyze and categorize/rank these, but I'm not sure how you'd do it objectively.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 00:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:05, 25 May 2009
I would say that this is one of the worst layer stones - of the few ores it possibly contains, it contains few to nothing --Höhlenschreck 23:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- <nods> Not all stones are built alike (and no two examples will be the same). Granite is clearly one of the superior layers, both for its richness and variety. Rhyolite and some others are consistently disappointing, in my experience anyway. It would be interesting to analyze and categorize/rank these, but I'm not sure how you'd do it objectively.--Albedo 00:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)