v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Freakazoid"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{blocked|[[User:Briess|Briess]]}} | ||
| + | |||
I have blocked you for being offensive and potentially intimidating behavior on Aescula's RfA page. I was going to just let the frivolous vote slide; however, linking other personal profiles is crossing the line. The ban is effective for one week. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 02:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | I have blocked you for being offensive and potentially intimidating behavior on Aescula's RfA page. I was going to just let the frivolous vote slide; however, linking other personal profiles is crossing the line. The ban is effective for one week. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 02:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Actually, if you look closely, Greenmeanie suggested that she was not a furry. Those links were to prove that she was. | :Actually, if you look closely, Greenmeanie suggested that she was not a furry. Those links were to prove that she was. | ||
Revision as of 13:45, 28 February 2010
 Please review our policies before making any additional edits after your block expires. |
I have blocked you for being offensive and potentially intimidating behavior on Aescula's RfA page. I was going to just let the frivolous vote slide; however, linking other personal profiles is crossing the line. The ban is effective for one week. --Briess 02:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, if you look closely, Greenmeanie suggested that she was not a furry. Those links were to prove that she was.
- I have to disagree. Looking at your edit context, ([1]) I find no evidence that your response was to disprove Greenmeanie. Quotes: "Some things you should know about Aescula:", " Furries cause drama." Nowhere do you specifically mention that you are providing evidence to disprove Greenmeanie, and that's not inferable from the context. I will go ahead and reduce your ban length from 1 week to 3 days, meaning it will expire sometime tomorrow. --Briess 09:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Just because I didn't put those links under greenmeanie's quote, doesn't mean they don't disprove greenmeanie's argument, and you know that. My opinion was left seperate from the facts. You're looking for a reason to justify your trigger happy ban finger, but all you have is this strawman argument. I deserve an apology from you.
- I don't apologize. --Briess 13:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Just because I didn't put those links under greenmeanie's quote, doesn't mean they don't disprove greenmeanie's argument, and you know that. My opinion was left seperate from the facts. You're looking for a reason to justify your trigger happy ban finger, but all you have is this strawman argument. I deserve an apology from you.
- I have to disagree. Looking at your edit context, ([1]) I find no evidence that your response was to disprove Greenmeanie. Quotes: "Some things you should know about Aescula:", " Furries cause drama." Nowhere do you specifically mention that you are providing evidence to disprove Greenmeanie, and that's not inferable from the context. I will go ahead and reduce your ban length from 1 week to 3 days, meaning it will expire sometime tomorrow. --Briess 09:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)