v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Underground pool"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm thinking this should maybe be moved to [[DF2010:Underground pool]]. --[[User:Mr Frog|Mr Frog]] 00:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | I'm thinking this should maybe be moved to [[DF2010:Underground pool]]. --[[User:Mr Frog|Mr Frog]] 00:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:What are the guidelines on features that don't exist in the CV but do in an older one and have something ''similar'' in the CV? If I had to guess, I would say either redirect this to cv:Underground pool and make that explain that such features don't exist, or to delete it entirely. Either way, I agree that it can't stay here. --[[User:Eagle0600|Eagle0600]] 00:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | :What are the guidelines on features that don't exist in the CV but do in an older one and have something ''similar'' in the CV? If I had to guess, I would say either redirect this to cv:Underground pool and make that explain that such features don't exist, or to delete it entirely. Either way, I agree that it can't stay here. --[[User:Eagle0600|Eagle0600]] 00:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::If it's an in-game term, it gets a cv article. If the term is ''not'' found in-game, but ''is'' a term found in the older version, then the term should only redirect to the old version. | ||
| + | ::If, however, it's a term that might informally get applied to something in the new version, then that's a judgement call. I don't ''think'' this is that, and I ''think'' this should get the axe because ugp is effectively not appropriate - but it's more matter of social intertia, whether users refer to any body of underground water as "UG pools" or not. (Enough of a change that I think not, but...)--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 02:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:19, 8 April 2010
I'm thinking this should maybe be moved to DF2010:Underground pool. --Mr Frog 00:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- What are the guidelines on features that don't exist in the CV but do in an older one and have something similar in the CV? If I had to guess, I would say either redirect this to cv:Underground pool and make that explain that such features don't exist, or to delete it entirely. Either way, I agree that it can't stay here. --Eagle0600 00:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- If it's an in-game term, it gets a cv article. If the term is not found in-game, but is a term found in the older version, then the term should only redirect to the old version.
- If, however, it's a term that might informally get applied to something in the new version, then that's a judgement call. I don't think this is that, and I think this should get the axe because ugp is effectively not appropriate - but it's more matter of social intertia, whether users refer to any body of underground water as "UG pools" or not. (Enough of a change that I think not, but...)--Albedo 02:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)