v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Soy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→More and yet more Categories: new section) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
There is a point when a new category really achieves nothing productive. "Physics"?--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 21:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC) | There is a point when a new category really achieves nothing productive. "Physics"?--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 21:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I fail to see how this is non-productive. If you take a look through the category pages you can see the result I am trying to achieve with the numerous edits that I have done to try to reorganize things. I posted notes about what I was attempting to do in multiple places and received no feedback whatsoever until this point. If you have a better suggestion for organization I would be happy to implement it. My general plan of attack was to segregate each category so that it ends up something like [[:Category:Creatures]] where you have a 'plain' category that links to each version of that category. It is almost like assigning each category to a namespace (like the articles are) only without actual namespaces. | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 20 April 2010
Re: Template Alloy3
I made a couple changes, it should work just fine now whether it is used in 40d or Df2010. Thanks for pointing it out. Emi [T] 17:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- For most templates there's no reason making a change similar to mine would break anything. Just don't do it to [[category:foo]] links. Emi [T] 20:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
deletion requests (etc.)
Done. And that was perfect, np by me. Readya later, --Albedo 18:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories
Thanks forthe heads up. GiantTiger11 00:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
More and yet more Categories
There is a point when a new category really achieves nothing productive. "Physics"?--Albedo 21:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- I fail to see how this is non-productive. If you take a look through the category pages you can see the result I am trying to achieve with the numerous edits that I have done to try to reorganize things. I posted notes about what I was attempting to do in multiple places and received no feedback whatsoever until this point. If you have a better suggestion for organization I would be happy to implement it. My general plan of attack was to segregate each category so that it ends up something like Category:Creatures where you have a 'plain' category that links to each version of that category. It is almost like assigning each category to a namespace (like the articles are) only without actual namespaces.