- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
v0.31 Talk:Millstone
Quality Discussions
I think this should be downgraded to an Elven article. It looks like a stub to me. – unsigned comment by Me
- Well.. it doesn't have any red links, with many blues. – unsigned comment by 92.10.72.113
I think it should be downgraded to +Fine+. There is a small, basic amount of information. No illustrations of how to hook up millstone to anything, no tips, etc.
Too many articles are marked as +Exceptional+ currently, due to the switch from "Elven", "Human", "Dwarven" to "Tattered", "Exceptional", and "Masterwork". Fine was added later, so most articles that SHOULD be marked "Fine" are currently marked "Exceptional".
I'm bumping this article down to "+Fine+". Others can bump it up if they disagree with me. --Darkstar 21:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ehhh... y'know, you could ADD those things you think should be in the article. See? I just did. And then I put it back to Exceptional. --DeMatt 21:55, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Millstone in general
... What's the advantage of a millstone over a quern? Is there any, really? --76.25.184.28 00:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)