v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

User talk:Briess

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Revision as of 14:51, 13 April 2013 by Lethosor (talk | contribs) (→‎Rating script: new section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive
Archives

Version namespace links

It appears that the recent update has caused version pages to link back to mainspace, instead of linking within their own version namespace automatically. For example, 40d:Potash_maker links to Potash, while 40d:Potash is the expected link. --Loci (talk) 15:04, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Looks like you're correct. I'll have to investigate and see what the fix is. --Briess (talk) 20:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Double redirects to sections

Though the wiki software is supposed to handle double redirects, it appears to fail when the redirect is to a subsection of a page -- see calm, for instance. --Zzedar (talk) 03:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Interesting. I will investigate, thanks for the report. --Briess (talk) 03:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Rating script

A few problems with the rating script seem to have popped up with the new software (these are probably more related to User:Emi, but you seem to be more active at the moment):

  • jsMsg() now fades out after a few seconds, preventing the automatic tests from completing in a few cases
  • Clicking a checkbox propagates up to the message box, causing it to fade out and preventing any further action (and showing it again with $("#mw-notification-area").show() doesn't work, because the text is cleared when it disappears).

The easiest solution here is probably to display the interface somewhere else, instead of using the notification system.

For the time being, I can rate articles manually, but it would be nice if someone could look into this. --Lethosor (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)