v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
v0.31 Talk:Native platinum
Revision as of 01:19, 14 June 2010 by 72.226.61.60 (talk)
Can we please get rid of this "alluvial layers" BS?? --Birthright 20:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's in the raws, so it's on the page. No need to get uptight about it. In fact, on the current version pages, it's impossible to get rid of it because the infobox contents are populated directly from the raws. --Quietust 20:21, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's possible to make it ignore the [ENVIRONMENT:ALLUVIAL:etc] type tags. However, why would we want to intentionally omit information the raw files provide? VengefulDonut 20:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- We'd want to omit the information because it is wrong. This article is full of incorrect information because it follows whats in the raws instead of how the game actually behaves. 72.226.61.60 01:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- It's possible to make it ignore the [ENVIRONMENT:ALLUVIAL:etc] type tags. However, why would we want to intentionally omit information the raw files provide? VengefulDonut 20:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
raws
The end of the 'raws' section here reads:
ore of mercury, powdered gives vermilion dye
This comment obviously belongs to cinnabar. Is there any convenient way to move it to this article? --Izar 20:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- It's a flaw in the regex we use to extract objects from the raw .txt files - it searches for [OBJECTTYPE:OBJECTNAME] (e.g. [CREATURE:DRAGON] or [INORGANIC:NATIVE_PLATINUM]) and then takes everything from that point up to the next "[OBJECTTYPE:" or the end of the file, whichever comes first. Ideally, we could alter it to strip stuff beyond the final right-bracket, but that would just discard the comment entirely, and adjusting the regex to include any comments before the desired object would be quite amazingly annoying. If your regex-fu is strong enough, then feel free to come up with something better (and make sure it doesn't cause PCRE to crash due to stack overflow - it tends to do that a LOT in PHP). --Quietust 22:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)