- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
User talk:VengefulDonut
Welcome to this wiki! Dwarf Fortress rapidly becomes more complicated, and we're always glad to have new writers.
Since we prefer that you try to follow our wiki's standards, we've made a list of basic guidelines. This is a template.
- To let us know who you are, please sign your posts on discussion pages by typing
--~~~~
after your posts. This can also be inserted with the button if JavaScript is enabled. - Never put a question mark in the title of a page. Question marks mess things up, and your page will be moved to a different name.
- When making comments on a talk page, use one more colon before each line in your comment than was used in the comment you reply to. Put exactly one empty line between comments by different users but do not use blank lines inside of a comment. If your comment has no indents, use
<br>
after each line. - Avoid making many small edits to a page. Instead, try to make one large edit. This makes the history of the page a lot easier to read.
- Don't edit the user page of another user. If you want to tell them something, add the comment to their talk page.
- If you put a comment at the bottom of a talk page with section headers, you've probably put it in a section. Don't put things in the wrong sections. If necessary, create a section.
- Most importantly, read and follow the rules. Really. Read them.
Well, since linking externally isn't popular, and copying part-content isn't popular, might as well give up --TinyPirate 05:11, 19 February 2009 (EST)
Re Parser Functions: Hmm... it was working in august, and supposedly in january at some point.
I guess i'll have to stop using my templates that relies on it, even though it was working back in august. :| thanks for the info -- Vaevictus 02:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
re stones
Thanks for the input - don't want to overstep trying to be "helpful" if I'm working off of bad info. But is a vein of Al an anomaly in the current version? I'm unsure how to read the RAW's at that level.
(edit) - matgloss_stone_mineral says...
"[ENVIRONMENT:IGNEOUS_EXTRUSIVE:CLUSTER_SMALL:100]"
- is that supposed to be small clusters only? --Albedo 07:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
"Refined Coal" vs "Fuel"
Hey - okay, I've learned a lot since the above changes. About the game, about this wiki - thanks again for your comments. On a different subject...
I find the term "refined coal" unnecessarily confusing. Refined coal, charcoal, bituminous coal - and coke (which is like coal, right?). But doesn't only mined coal get refined? Wood is not refined - charcoal is not coal - does charcoal get refined after it's produced? Bleh. When I first read that page, a day-one n00b in the game, it was complete gibberish, and even now it takes some wading through. Maybe I'm over-thinking it, but still...
I never see the term "refined coal" used anywhere in the game or forums. However, you are the one who originally changed the designated term from fuel to rc in the first place, over a year ago...
- "6:28, 21 February 2008 VengefulDonut (Talk | contribs) m (Refined Coal moved to Refined coal: in accordance to naming conventions)"
What are the "naming conventions" you are referring to? Was that simply to match the term used in the article to the page title?
I'd like to put that entire article under "Fuel", and retire the term "refined coal" in favor of that word. Nothing else need change - with the exception of that one term, the page as is would be copied/pasted and moved whole cloth. (Currently, "fuel" redirects to the "refined coal" page.) A short explanation on th RC page, to save the history & directing people to Fuel. Redirects from "charcoal" and "coke" would go to "fuel". Any coal would then be either Bituminous or Char-, and the world a little brighter. imo.
But, while "B" is for Bold, I thought there was nothing lost in asking your opinion on the move first, since you were the one to see cause to change it in the first place. (respond on my page or in forums if you'd prefer) --Albedo 22:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)