User talk:99.19.68.61

Recent removals

Hi! You've recently removed content on DF2014:Cave fish man, DF2014:Lizard man, and DF2014:Alligator man - in the case of the first two, you've removed it twice, after it was restored by someone else with an explanation. Instead of repeatedly making the same edit like this, please start a discussion on the article's talk page about why the content should be removed. —Lethosor (talk) 06:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I'm not Mx. 99, but i'd like to say that based upon the explanations given, this person's edits seem to me to be completely morally correct. Seeing as, uh, the game referenced is one where it is absolutely critical that one know as little about it as possible before playing it (at least, from what i know—i've never played the game), this inherently means that any detail about its content will inherently be massively spoilerous. Speaking as somebody who has personally suffered massively from such spoilers, i wholly support this person's actions. BlueManedHawk (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

This is not the reason that I made the edits. I made the edits because Undertale is a bad game that promotes cruel, fallacious morals that claim that there are no second chances in life and that people who have fucked up cannot be redeemed. This content does not belong on this website--even the worst of us can always be made into a better person. 99.19.68.61 18:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

MARK YOUR FUCKING SPOILERS GODDAMMIT BlueManedHawk (talk) 18:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Regardless of whether Undertale is a "bad game", it is not your place to delete references to it from this wiki. And even if it was, calling it "suspicious text" is completely meaningless. --Quietust (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Also, chill out - the game was released over 6 years ago, so if you're still worried about spoilers for it then you've got much bigger problems to worry about. --Quietust (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

I'M SORRY, BUT I CANNOT CHILL OUT

I HAVE SUFFERED ENOUGH FROM MASSIVE SPOILERS

I AM NOT ABLE TO PLAY THE GAME AT THIS POINT IN MY LIFE AND I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO FOR A FEW YEARS

I WILL NOT TOLERATE OTHERS BEING MADE TO SUFFER THROUGH THE SAME FATE AS I HAVE

NOR WILL I TOLERATE RECEIVING ANY MORE SPOILERS THAN I ALREADY HAVE

IS IT SOMEHOW WRONG TO PROTECT MY FELLOW MAN FROM THE SUFFERING OF AN INFINITE CURSE OF KNOWLEDGE?

^{ALSO SHOUTOUT TO MEDIAWIKI FOR LETTING ME SPEAK ENTIRELY IN BRIGHT RED}

I am sorry about this outburst. Spoilers, particularly massive spoilers for classics, are one of the few things that will genuinely rile me up.

Also, as i mentioned above: Because the game referenced is one where it is absolutely critical that one know as little about it as possible, we can logically conclude that any piece of information about its content is inherently massively spoilerous. Furthermore, spoilers do not decrease in intensity over time—they cause just as much pain and suffering years from the release of what they pertain to as they do when the piece of media is new.

I hope that this makes clear my point of view now. Have a nice day.

Regards,

—BlueManedHawk (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)