v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing 40d Talk:Chalk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "40d"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Until the engravers decide to start engraving melting dwarves. On second thought, maybe the kids should learn some history. Of the [[Boatmurdered]] variety. Those kids won't sleep for weeks. --[[User:Smartmo|Smartmo]] 16:27, 13 January 2009 (EST) | :::Until the engravers decide to start engraving melting dwarves. On second thought, maybe the kids should learn some history. Of the [[Boatmurdered]] variety. Those kids won't sleep for weeks. --[[User:Smartmo|Smartmo]] 16:27, 13 January 2009 (EST) | ||
− | |||
== Page 1 of my penance == | == Page 1 of my penance == | ||
Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
::Well, it's certainly thorough. Whether it's formatted in a way that's user-friendly is another question. And it runs blatantly against the current standardized format - so unless you're going to take responsibility for changing ''every'' stone page to fit this format, you should hold off. (You deleted the Template - it was made for a reason, so a User can glance at a similar page and compare/contrast at a glance - impossible with this monster.) You should also hold off on such a radical change until bouncing it off a discussion page or three - see current conversation on the Main Page.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 09:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ::Well, it's certainly thorough. Whether it's formatted in a way that's user-friendly is another question. And it runs blatantly against the current standardized format - so unless you're going to take responsibility for changing ''every'' stone page to fit this format, you should hold off. (You deleted the Template - it was made for a reason, so a User can glance at a similar page and compare/contrast at a glance - impossible with this monster.) You should also hold off on such a radical change until bouncing it off a discussion page or three - see current conversation on the Main Page.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 09:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | :::This page contains all generic info on sedimentary stone. I suggest the generic info be kept in the sedimentary article, with the chalk-specific info either here, or in a flux stone subsection on the sedimentary page, and in a sub-subsection on chalk. --[[User:Nahno|Nahno]] 13:55 | + | :::This page contains all generic info on sedimentary stone. I very much suggest the generic info be kept in the sedimentary article, with the chalk-specific info either here, or in a flux stone subsection on the sedimentary page, and in a sub-subsection on chalk. --[[User:Nahno|Nahno]] 13:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
− | |||
− |