v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Conglomerate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
LegacyCWAL (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
What makes you think this applies to every world DF generates? Before putting such a theory in an article, we need good reason not to think it's random. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 18:22, 22 August 2008 (EDT) | What makes you think this applies to every world DF generates? Before putting such a theory in an article, we need good reason not to think it's random. [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 18:22, 22 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is it ''really'' necessary to list all the gems it can have, especially when so many are relatively generic? --[[User:LegacyCWAL|LegacyCWAL]] 17:14, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:14, 18 March 2009
conglomerate seems to contain far, far, more iron ore than any ~other layer~ it has decent coal veins, but almost no tetrahedrite, and little platinum we need to make this wiki a guide as to what rock is good for what, and this rock contains massive iron deposits(both limonite and magnetite) but no flux if you could help me with the other layers it would be much appreciated.– unsigned comment by eerr
What makes you think this applies to every world DF generates? Before putting such a theory in an article, we need good reason not to think it's random. VengefulDonut 18:22, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
Is it really necessary to list all the gems it can have, especially when so many are relatively generic? --LegacyCWAL 17:14, 18 March 2009 (UTC)