v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Editing Category talk:DF2012:Creatures

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.


The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Since this is a category for [[creature]]s, I believe it should be limited to actual creature pages. Adding pages that "relate" to creatures (such as [[status icons]], titles like [[King of beasts]], etc.) is problematic for a number of reasons. There are already 500+ pages in this category; ancillary pages in the category are very likely to be "lost in the shuffle". (Who's going to search a list of creatures for information on status icons?) It also reduces the usefulness of the category for finding actual creatures. (How many creatures are in Dwarf Fortress? 564, minus however many non-creature pages are currently in the creatures category.) Finally, since Dwarf Fortress is a game about creatures, pretty much every article on the wiki is "related to creatures" in some manner--recreating [[Special:AllPages]] isn't valuable to anyone. --[[User:Loci|Loci]] ([[User talk:Loci|talk]]) 19:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 
Since this is a category for [[creature]]s, I believe it should be limited to actual creature pages. Adding pages that "relate" to creatures (such as [[status icons]], titles like [[King of beasts]], etc.) is problematic for a number of reasons. There are already 500+ pages in this category; ancillary pages in the category are very likely to be "lost in the shuffle". (Who's going to search a list of creatures for information on status icons?) It also reduces the usefulness of the category for finding actual creatures. (How many creatures are in Dwarf Fortress? 564, minus however many non-creature pages are currently in the creatures category.) Finally, since Dwarf Fortress is a game about creatures, pretty much every article on the wiki is "related to creatures" in some manner--recreating [[Special:AllPages]] isn't valuable to anyone. --[[User:Loci|Loci]] ([[User talk:Loci|talk]]) 19:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 
* Full, non-comparison alphabet lists are useless to human searchers in any case. Nobody is going to manually look up hundreds articles from A to X (unless he is checking all of them anyway). It's totally innefective way to search. Especially since there is regular searchbox for searching by name, semi-categorized sortable comparison tables, and, by now, useful and human searcheable lists in subcategories for searching by trait (great thing!). Ergo, main category should be freed for related, more general/inportant stuff, and creatures themselves should stay in trait related lists.<br />"since Dwarf Fortress is a game about creatures" - creatures are regular content, moddable one, general mechanics are more important wikiwise and should not be stuffed "somewhere deeper". [[User:AO|AO]] ([[User talk:AO|talk]]) 20:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 
* Full, non-comparison alphabet lists are useless to human searchers in any case. Nobody is going to manually look up hundreds articles from A to X (unless he is checking all of them anyway). It's totally innefective way to search. Especially since there is regular searchbox for searching by name, semi-categorized sortable comparison tables, and, by now, useful and human searcheable lists in subcategories for searching by trait (great thing!). Ergo, main category should be freed for related, more general/inportant stuff, and creatures themselves should stay in trait related lists.<br />"since Dwarf Fortress is a game about creatures" - creatures are regular content, moddable one, general mechanics are more important wikiwise and should not be stuffed "somewhere deeper". [[User:AO|AO]] ([[User talk:AO|talk]]) 20:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 
::I personally find this category useful on occasion, but, useless or not, it does not become more useful by adding tangentially related pages. It certainly isn't necessary to "clean out" the creature pages from the creatures category so that you can repurpose it. Why not just create a new category? These "important" creature-related pages would have better exposure than they ever will buried in the creatures category, and it wouldn't interfere with the current use of this category either. I just don't see the downside to making a new category.--[[User:Loci|Loci]] ([[User talk:Loci|talk]]) 19:14, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to Dwarf Fortress Wiki are considered to be released under the GFDL & MIT (see Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Please sign comments with ~~~~

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)