v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Request for Adminship/Bombcar
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
#* ''Editors who don't need the tools shouldn't be given them''. (But because being an admin isn't a big deal, who cares? These editors are no less then any admin in any kind of discussion or debate.) [[User:Mason11987|Mason11987]] 21:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | #* ''Editors who don't need the tools shouldn't be given them''. (But because being an admin isn't a big deal, who cares? These editors are no less then any admin in any kind of discussion or debate.) [[User:Mason11987|Mason11987]] 21:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
# '''OPPOSE''': Zero disrespect to Bombcar, but I'm afraid I haven't seen or read any reason to vote in support, and I have seen something to make me mistrust you (Your joke). --[[User:DarthCloakedDwarf|DarthCloakedDwarf]] 03:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | # '''OPPOSE''': Zero disrespect to Bombcar, but I'm afraid I haven't seen or read any reason to vote in support, and I have seen something to make me mistrust you (Your joke). --[[User:DarthCloakedDwarf|DarthCloakedDwarf]] 03:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | # '''OPPOSE''': The reason I have decided to oppose is because your submission seemed to lack effort. when I read it, compared to some of the other submissions, it felt as though you were saying "Hey, its me, please vote, I would be good". You ''might'' be a good administrator, but i would rather stick with someone i know more about. | + | # '''OPPOSE''': The reason I have decided to oppose is because your submission seemed to lack effort. when I read it, compared to some of the other submissions, it felt as though you were saying "Hey, its me, please vote, I would be good". You ''might'' be a good administrator, but i would rather stick with someone i know more about. |
===Neutral=== | ===Neutral=== | ||
# '''NEUTRAL''': Unfortunately, I have not seen enough evidence presented here to make my own mind for a vote either way. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 20:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC) | # '''NEUTRAL''': Unfortunately, I have not seen enough evidence presented here to make my own mind for a vote either way. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 20:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
# '''NEUTRAL''': I don't know, all the minor edits don't really stand for anything gigantic, the "building destroyer 2" and the redirects aren't all that important (since most users will type it in correctly anyway), I like your ability to be at the computer, but you don't seem to be very active in major wiki editing, and not being an admin does not prevent you from doing what you are already doing correctly. --[[User:Tarran|Tarran]] 03:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC) | # '''NEUTRAL''': I don't know, all the minor edits don't really stand for anything gigantic, the "building destroyer 2" and the redirects aren't all that important (since most users will type it in correctly anyway), I like your ability to be at the computer, but you don't seem to be very active in major wiki editing, and not being an admin does not prevent you from doing what you are already doing correctly. --[[User:Tarran|Tarran]] 03:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC) | ||