v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing Ethic
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
If you are creating a redirect to the current version's page, do not use any namespace. For example: use #REDIRECT [[Cat]], not #REDIRECT [[Main:Cat]] or #REDIRECT [[cv:Cat]]. See DF:Versions for more information.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
If an entity's accumulated animosity towards another passes a certain threshold (determined by the ruler's personality) then it will run a risk-assessment check. If passed, this will lead to a declaration of war. | If an entity's accumulated animosity towards another passes a certain threshold (determined by the ruler's personality) then it will run a risk-assessment check. If passed, this will lead to a declaration of war. | ||
− | In general, entities react much more strongly to actions that violate | + | In general, entities react much more strongly to actions that violate their taboos than to the outlawing of their customs in other civilisations. |
For example, Civ A finds slavery Acceptable, but Civ B considers it a Capital Offence. | For example, Civ A finds slavery Acceptable, but Civ B considers it a Capital Offence. | ||
* Civ A will consider Civ B most unreasonable (−5) for executing people over such a non-issue. | * Civ A will consider Civ B most unreasonable (−5) for executing people over such a non-issue. |