v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:On the origins of dwarves"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Rating: new section) |
(→Rating: I say Exceptional.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This article isn't one person's writing, and not really relevant to the game. It either should not have a rating at all, or should be Tattered. [[User:Gzalzi|Gzalzi]] 20:27, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | This article isn't one person's writing, and not really relevant to the game. It either should not have a rating at all, or should be Tattered. [[User:Gzalzi|Gzalzi]] 20:27, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :This article is a mainspace article, therefore the links to mainspace (instead of L-template) are appropriate. It is clearly marked with the "D for Dwarf" template, thus indicating that the text is not to be treated as Holy Writ. I'll tentatitvely agree with you on the "no rating" part, but without agreement from more and senior editors, I'm not removing the template. --[[User:DeMatt|DeMatt]] 21:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 1 January 2011
This page is utterly hilarious; an absolute masterpiece of dwarven humour. This guy should be a comedian. -- KingAuggie
Rating
This article isn't one person's writing, and not really relevant to the game. It either should not have a rating at all, or should be Tattered. Gzalzi 20:27, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- This article is a mainspace article, therefore the links to mainspace (instead of L-template) are appropriate. It is clearly marked with the "D for Dwarf" template, thus indicating that the text is not to be treated as Holy Writ. I'll tentatitvely agree with you on the "no rating" part, but without agreement from more and senior editors, I'm not removing the template. --DeMatt 21:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)