v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Orthogonal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC) | Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --[[User:Bouchart|Bouchart]] 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::I would say that it depends. How many relevant articles are there? If it applies to more than two or three articles, then saying it in one place can be a good thing. That way, instead of defining it like twenty times, they can just say [[Orthogonal]] and move on to the article as a whole, adding four strokes instead of four hundred. --[[User:Burlingk|Burlingk]] 03:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | + | ::I would say that it depends. How many relevant articles are there? If it applies to more than two or three articles, then saying it in one place can be a good thing. That way, instead of defining it like twenty times, they can just say <nowiki>[[</nowiki>[[Orthogonal]]<nowiki>]]</nowiki> and move on to the article as a whole, adding four strokes instead of four hundred. --[[User:Burlingk|Burlingk]] 03:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:21, 17 July 2010
Is this page necessary? I don't think it says anything that can't be said in the relevant articles. --Bouchart 03:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- I would say that it depends. How many relevant articles are there? If it applies to more than two or three articles, then saying it in one place can be a good thing. That way, instead of defining it like twenty times, they can just say [[Orthogonal]] and move on to the article as a whole, adding four strokes instead of four hundred. --Burlingk 03:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)