v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Microcline"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::So you like royal blue over sky-blue? Or are you a navy fan? --[[User:DeMatt|DeMatt]] 16:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | :::So you like royal blue over sky-blue? Or are you a navy fan? --[[User:DeMatt|DeMatt]] 16:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Royal Blue all the way.. :D | ::::Royal Blue all the way.. :D | ||
| + | :::::Well, it's nice if you're building a palace out of ice or something. [[User:Freya|Freya]] 02:44, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:44, 17 December 2010
Microcline magma-safe?
It seems to be magma safe as I have a fortress with a microcline door holding back the magma resevoir--Scout890 22:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's because you haven't opened the door yet - tiles adjacent to magma only heat up to 10075, while tiles containing magma heat up all the way to 12000. --Quietust 22:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Cyan versus Blue
I think it's worth noting how disgusting microcline is. Surely I'm not the only person who thinks this? "You have struck microcline!" to me, brings only a sigh, as I send in the masons to cover this blight.. – unsigned comment by 86.181.51.26
- But what if you like blue? Freya 08:11, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, blue's nice. But, microcline isn't really blue.. It's cyan and cyan is UGLY! – unsigned comment by 86.181.51.26