v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Riking"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '==Bar== If the page only qualifies as "Fine", then what does it need in order to qualify as Exceptional? --~~~~') |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Bar== | ==Bar== | ||
If the page only qualifies as "Fine", then what does it need in order to qualify as Exceptional? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 02:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC) | If the page only qualifies as "Fine", then what does it need in order to qualify as Exceptional? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 02:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Hm. One second, I'll go get an account. (Procrastinated long enough!) 02:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Okay, reviewing quality specs.. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Upon review of the quality specifications, I have undid my classification. My reason was.... I don't really know, something about it made me not like it. Hm, maybe we could add a sidebox about it. [[User:Riking|Riking]] 02:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:55, 19 May 2011
Bar[edit]
If the page only qualifies as "Fine", then what does it need in order to qualify as Exceptional? --Quietust 02:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hm. One second, I'll go get an account. (Procrastinated long enough!) 02:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, reviewing quality specs..
- Upon review of the quality specifications, I have undid my classification. My reason was.... I don't really know, something about it made me not like it. Hm, maybe we could add a sidebox about it. Riking 02:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC)